WIKI  (LOCAL-MD-001)MODE: READ_ONLYSYS_TIME: --:--:--
SECTION:targetsPAGES:14CURRENT:active/fieldguide.md
TARGETS-003active/fieldguide.mdUPDATED: 07/14/2026

Fieldguide

Status: researching

Priority: 2

Role: AI Engineer

Job ops data:

  • ID: 7e084167-15c3-4d89-839d-5086090d0652.
  • Score: 84.
  • Status: ready.
  • Source: linkedin.
  • Salary: $150,000-$220,000.
  • Location: San Francisco; described as remote-first, with exact office expectations unclear.
  • Application: Open listing.
  • App brief: build AI agents, retrieval logic, evaluations, and production feedback loops for enterprise audit and advisory workflows.
  • App suitability reminder: strong match on product engineering, React/Postgres, workflow automation, AI systems, and cross-functional delivery.

Company thesis:

  • Fieldguide automates assurance and audit work across cybersecurity, privacy, and financial audits.
  • The role translates high-stakes customer workflows into reliable agent behavior, making it FDE-adjacent even though it sits in product engineering.

Fit for me:

  • Strongest match: turning customer workflows into engineering requirements and shipped software.
  • Second match: RAG, retrieval, human-in-the-loop systems, workflow automation, React, and Postgres.
  • Third match: explainability, evaluation, and trust in professional workflows.
  • Biggest gap: explicit production TypeScript/Python and direct ownership of deployed LLM evaluation systems.
  • Risk or concern: the listing describes a typical candidate with 1-3 years of experience and senior guidance, which may indicate a level mismatch.

Relevant wiki links:

Signal to research:

  • Fieldguide's audit workflow and primary practitioner personas.
  • Whether remote-first includes permanent Colorado-based employees.
  • How agent outputs are evaluated for explainability and professional judgment.
  • Whether the company has a more senior applied-AI or product-engineering track.

Interview prep:

  • Story to prepare: building a trustworthy workflow around sensitive or high-stakes information.
  • Technical topic to refresh: retrieval evaluation, grounded outputs, human review, and audit trails.
  • Customer scenario to practice: automate part of an audit workflow while keeping judgment, evidence, and approval visible.
  • Smart question to ask: "How do you distinguish an agent output that is technically grounded from one an auditor can actually rely on?"
  • Resume / cover letter angle: experienced workflow builder bringing product judgment, customer translation, and trustworthy AI patterns to professional services software.

Next action:

  • Confirm role level and Colorado remote eligibility before investing in full application tailoring.

Back